| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
<!-- Thank you for making a PR! Bug fixes are always welcome, but if
you're adding a new feature or changing an existing one, we'd really
appreciate if you open an issue, post on the forum, or drop in on
Discord -->
## Checks
- [ ] I am happy for maintainers to push small adjustments to this PR,
to speed up the review cycle
- [ ] I have checked that there are no existing pull requests for the
same thing
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
<!-- Thank you for making a PR! Bug fixes are always welcome, but if
you're adding a new feature or changing an existing one, we'd really
appreciate if you open an issue, post on the forum, or drop in on
Discord -->
## Checks
- [ ] I am happy for maintainers to push small adjustments to this PR,
to speed up the review cycle
- [ ] I have checked that there are no existing pull requests for the
same thing
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
<!-- Thank you for making a PR! Bug fixes are always welcome, but if
you're adding a new feature or changing an existing one, we'd really
appreciate if you open an issue, post on the forum, or drop in on
Discord -->
## Checks
- [ ] I am happy for maintainers to push small adjustments to this PR,
to speed up the review cycle
- [ ] I have checked that there are no existing pull requests for the
same thing
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Resolves breaking checks on `main`
## Checks
- [ ] I am happy for maintainers to push small adjustments to this PR,
to speed up the review cycle
- [ ] I have checked that there are no existing pull requests for the
same thing
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Evaluating the overlay produces the following evaluation warning:
`'system' has been renamed to/replaced by 'stdenv.hostPlatform.system'`
<!-- Thank you for making a PR! Bug fixes are always welcome, but if
you're adding a new feature or changing an existing one, we'd really
appreciate if you open an issue, post on the forum, or drop in on
Discord -->
## Checks
- [x] I am happy for maintainers to push small adjustments to this PR,
to speed up the review cycle
- [x] I have checked that there are no existing pull requests for the
same thing
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #2989.
The nix build fails, because the sha256 in the toolchain fetcher doesn't
match.
## Checks
- [x] I am happy for maintainers to push small adjustments to this PR,
to speed up the review cycle
- [x] I have checked that there are no existing pull requests for the
same thing
> [!IMPORTANT]
>
> Before merging this, we should probably investigate why the hash has
changed. It could be a sign of a supply chain attack.
Co-authored-by: Marc Jakobi <marc.jakobi@tiko.energy>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
<!-- Thank you for making a PR! Bug fixes are always welcome, but if
you're adding a new feature or changing an existing one, we'd really
appreciate if you open an issue, post on the forum, or drop in on
Discord -->
## Checks
- [ ] I am happy for maintainers to push small adjustments to this PR,
to speed up the review cycle
- [ ] I have checked that there are no existing pull requests for the
same thing
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
<!-- Thank you for making a PR! Bug fixes are always welcome, but if
you're adding a new feature or changing an existing one, we'd really
appreciate if you open an issue, post on the forum, or drop in on
Discord -->
## Checks
- [X] I am happy for maintainers to push small adjustments to this PR,
to speed up the review cycle
- [X] I have checked that there are no existing pull requests for the
same thing
Hopefully this one is mergeable as is, unlike the 1.89 upgrade.
Fixes: #2915
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Thanks for your work on atuin! I've loved using it over the past year.
According to nixos.org[^1], the `darwin.apple_sdk` frameworks have been stubs for some time, and are now removed. Evaluating `atuin` on darwin on `nixpkgs-unstable` results in the following evaluation error:
```
error: darwin.apple_sdk_11_0 has been
removed as it was a legacy compatibility stub; see
<https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/stable/#sec-darwin-legacy-frameworks>
for migration instructions
```
According to those linked docs, the fix is to remove references to these SDKs, which will not have any other effect since they were stubs anyway.
[^1]: https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/stable/#sec-darwin-legacy-frameworks
<!-- Thank you for making a PR! Bug fixes are always welcome, but if you're adding a new feature or changing an existing one, we'd really appreciate if you open an issue, post on the forum, or drop in on Discord -->
## Checks
- [x] I am happy for maintainers to push small adjustments to this PR, to speed up the review cycle
- [x] I have checked that there are no existing pull requests for the same thing
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* chore: update to rust 1.88
* clippy + fmt
* update ci version
* update flake
|
| |
|
| |
This reverts commit 9d816d16db233dd1aa477bfe1cc5a960e3c7b6c7.
|
| |
|
| |
This reverts commit f0e8cc753e8448d415ae90ad7774058c6c5d47f7.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* chore: update to rust 1.86
* fix: clippy errors from 1.86
* fix: update nix sha256
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* chore: upgrade to 2024 edition
* ugh unsafe
* format
* nixxxxxxxxxxx why
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* chore: update rust toolchain to 1.85
* nix things
* make clippy happy
I've replaced a bunch of &Option<String> with Option<String>.
They were not in hot loops, so a single clone is really no big deal +
keeps things simpler.
* fmt
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
fixes #2360
https://blog.rust-lang.org/2024/08/08/Rust-1.80.1.html
`1.80.1` fixes a fairly nasty miscompilation, but that's not my motivation for opening this PR.
If I'm understanding correctly, because the rust patch version was not specified in `rust-toolchain.toml`, nix automatically upgraded to the new version. This broke the hash in `flake.nix` causing the flake to fail to build. Making this upgrade to `1.80.1` explicit, fixes this issue.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I accidentially broke my atuin database by executing `atuin` from the
PR I was working on without setting these variables and had to manually
roll back my local database.
That shouldn't happen, so we set the database and record store path in
the devshell to something that does not overwrite our normal databases.
We also warn if these files already exist, because when entering the
devshell, a user might want to start from a clean slate here.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Beyer <mail@beyermatthias.de>
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
